• Can You Have A Valid License In Two States
• You Don't Have A Valid License To Run Csr Harmony

Well it seems CSR hasn't updated the drivers for these devices in quite some time but here is a link so you can pick the one you need as well as a tutorial for making bluetooth devices work with windows 7 incase you need it. Running the vRealize Certificate Generation Tool Ok, so you either prepped your Mac for running the tool, decided you weren’t going to bother with certs other than those for vRA proper, or don’t have a Mac and want to run the tool from one of the vRA appliances.

Can any one tell me where can I download 'CSR Harmony' bluetooth stack software. I'm searching wildly for this software. Please can anyone tell me where to download it. My bluetooth dongle is useless without this software so please help.

garzantiSoham DasguptaSoham Dasgupta

closed as off-topic by Stewbob, Frambot, Brad Larson♦Oct 3 '13 at 17:41

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

• 'Questions about general computing hardware and software are off-topic for Stack Overflow unless they directly involve tools used primarily for programming. You may be able to get help on Super User.' – Stewbob, Frambot, Brad Larson

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Can You Have A Valid License In Two States

2 Answers

CSR Harmony is not free. You must make an account on CSR support website and request access. However this stack is for integrators, when you integrate their chips into your hardware products.

garzantigarzanti

You Don't Have A Valid License To Run Csr Harmony

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged bluetooth or ask your own question.

Little is known about when corporate social responsibility (CSR) leads to a sustainability case (i.e., to improvements in environmental and social performance). Building on various forms of decoupling, we develop a theoretical framework for examining pathways from institutional pressures through CSR management to sustainability performance. To empirically identify such pathways, we apply fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to an extensive dataset from 19 large companies. We discover that different pathways are associated with environmental and social performance (non)improvements, and that pathways to success and failure are for the most part not symmetrical. We identify two pathways to improved environmental performance: an exogenous and an endogenous one. We find two pathways to improved social performance that both involve integrating social responsibility into the core business. Pathways to nonimprovements are multiple, suggesting that failure can occur in a number of ways, while there are only a few pathways to sustainability performance improvements.

Adams, J., Taschian, A., Shore, T. (1996). Ethics in family and nonfamily owned firms: An exploratory study. Family Business Review, 9, 157-170. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals

Aguinis, H., Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38, 932-968. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI

Albareda, L., Lozano, J., Ysa, T. (2007). Public policies on corporate social responsibility: The role of governments in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 391-407. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

Aravind, D., Christmann, P. (2011). Decoupling of standard implementation from certification: Does quality of ISO 14001 implementation affect facilities’ environmental performance? Business Ethics Quarterly, 21, 73-102. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

Arthur, L., Cato, M. S., Keenoy, T., Smith, R. (2007). Corporate social responsibility in your own backyard. Social Responsibility Journal, 3(2), 32-38. Google Scholar | Crossref

Aversa, P., Furnari, S., Haefliger, S. (2015). Business model configurations and performance: A qualitative comparative analysis in Formula One racing, 2005-2013. Industrial and Corporate Change, 24, 655-676. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

Banerjee, S. B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Cheltenham, UK: Edgar Elgar. Google Scholar | Crossref

Barla, P. (2007). ISO 14001 certification and environmental performance in Quebec’s pulp and paper industry. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 53, 291-306. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

Basurto, X., Speer, J. (2012). Structuring the calibration of qualitative data as sets for qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). Field Methods, 24, 155-174. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI

Behnam, M., MacLean, T. (2011). Where is the accountability in international accountability standards? A decoupling perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1, 45-72. Google Scholar | Crossref

Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Larraza-Kintana, M. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: Do family-controlled firms pollute less. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, 82-113. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals

Bingham, J., Dyer, W., Smith, I., Adams, G. (2011). A stakeholder identity orientation approach to corporate social performance in family firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 99, 565-585. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

Blowfield, M., Murray, A. (2011). Corporate responsibility: A critical introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar

Boiral, O. (2007). Corporate greening through ISO 14001: A rational myth? Organization Science, 18, 127-146. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

Boiral, O. (2011). Managing with ISO systems: Lessons from practice. Long Range Planning, 44, 197-220. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

Bowen, F., Aragon-Correa, A. (2014). Greenwashing in corporate environmentalism research and practice: The importance of what we say and do. Organization & Environment, 27, 107-112. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI

Brickson, S. L. (2005). Organizational identity orientation: Forging a link between organizational identity and organizations’ relations with stakeholders. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 576-609. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI

Bromley, P., Hwang, H., Powell, W. W. (2012). Decoupling revisited: Common pressures, divergent strategies in the US nonprofit sector. [email protected]@gement, 15, 468-501. Google Scholar | Crossref

Bromley, P., Powell, W. W. (2012). From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world. Academy of Management Annals, 6, 483-530. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

Brown, D., Knudsen, J. S. (2013). The role of domestic institutions and market pressures as drivers of corporate social responsibility (CSR): An examination of company CSR initiatives in Denmark and the UK. Political Studies, 63, 181-201. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals

Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would companies behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32, 946-967. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

Cetindamar, D., Husoy, K. (2007). Corporate social responsibility practices and environmentally responsible behavior: The case of the United Nations Global Compact. Journal of Business Ethics, 76, 163-176. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

Chatterji, A., Levine, D., Toffel, M. (2009). How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 18(1), 125-169. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

COM . (2012). Small and medium-sized enterprises. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sme/facts-figures-analysis/sme-definition/index_en.htm Google Scholar

Credit Suisse . (2015). Global Wealth Report. Retrieved from https://publications.credit-suisse.com/tasks/render/file/?fileID=F2425415-DCA7-80B8-EAD989AF9341D47E Google Scholar

Crilly, D., Hansen, M., Zollo, M. (2016). The grammar of decoupling: A cognitive-linguistic perspective on firms’ sustainability claims and stakeholders’ interpretation. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 705-729. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

Crilly, D., Zollo, M., Hansen, M. (2012). Faking it or muddling through? Understanding decoupling in response to stakeholder pressures. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 1429-1449. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

Delmas, M., Pecovic, S. (2017). Organizational configurations for sustainability and employee productivity: A qualitative comparative analysis approach. Business & Society, 57, 216-251. doi: Google Scholar | SAGE Journals

DiMaggio, P., Powell, W. (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar

Dubois, A., Gadde, L.-E. (2002). Systematic combining: An abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research, 55, 553-560. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

Dunphy, D., Griffiths, A., Benn, S. (2003). Organizational change for corporate sustainability. London, England: Routledge. Google Scholar

Dyer, W., Whetten, D. (2006). Family firms and social responsibility: Preliminary evidence from the S&P 500. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 785-803. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI

Edelman, L. B. (1992). Legal ambiguity and symbolic structures: Organizational mediation of civil rights law. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1531-1576. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

Erkkola, S., Melanen, M., Mickwitz, P. (2005). Eco-efficiency in the Finnish EMAS reports—A buzz word? Journal of Cleaner Production, 13, 799-813. Google Scholar | Crossref

Fereday, J., Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 80-92. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals

Fiss, P. (2007). A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1180-1198. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

Fiss, P. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 393-420. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

Fiss, P. C., Zajac, E. J. (2006). The symbolic management of strategic change: Sensegiving via framing and decoupling. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 1173-1193. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

Fleming, P., Jones, B. (2013). The end of corporate social responsibility: Crisis and critique. London, England: SAGE. Google Scholar

Godfrey, P., Merrill, C., Hansen, J. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 425-445. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

Grandori, A., Furnari, S. (2009). Types of complementarity, combinative organization forms and structural heterogeneity: Beyond discrete structural alternatives. In Morroni, M. (Ed.), Corporate governance, organization and the firm: Co-operation and outsourcing in a globalized market (pp. 63-86). London, England: Edward Elgar. Google Scholar | Crossref

Haack, P., Schoeneborn, D. (2015). Is decoupling becoming decoupled from institutional theory? A commentary on Wijen. Academy of Management Review, 40, 307-310. Google Scholar | Crossref

Haack, P., Schoeneborn, D., Wickert, C. (2012). Talking the talk, moral entrapment, creeping commitment? Exploring narrative dynamics in corporate responsibility standardization. Organization Studies, 33, 815-845. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI

Halme, M., Laurila, J. (2009). Philanthropy, integration or innovation? Exploring the financial and societal outcomes of different types of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 325-339. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

Hart, S. (2007). Capitalism at the crossroads: The unlimited business opportunities in solving the world’s most difficult problems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School. Google Scholar

Herbohn, K., Walker, J., Loo, H. (2014). Corporate social responsibility: The link between sustainability disclosure and sustainability performance. Journal of Accounting, Finance and Business Studies, 50, 422-459. Google Scholar

Hillman, A., Keim, G. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues. What’s the bottom line? Journal of Management Studies, 43, 75-91. Google Scholar

Howard-Grenville, J., Nash, J., Coglianese, C. (2008). Constructing the license to operate: Internal factors and their influence on corporate environmental decisions. Law and Policy, 30, 73-107. Google Scholar | Crossref

Husted, B. W., Allen, D. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the multinational enterprise: Strategic and institutional approaches. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 838-849. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

International Labour Office . (2011). Making globalization socially sustainable (Bacchetta, M., Jansen, M. Eds.). Geneva, Switzerland: ILO Publications. Google Scholar

Jensen, M. (2002). Value maximisation, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12, 235-256. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

Kinnicutt, S. T., Mirvis, P. (2008). Structures and strategies. Profile of the practice 2008: Managing corporate citizenship. Boston, MA: Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenship. Google Scholar

Kuisma, M., Lovio, R., Niskanen, S. (2001). The impact of environmental management systems in industrial companies. Suomen Ympäristö, 486. Google Scholar

Lankoski, L. (2009). Differential economic impacts of corporate responsibility issues. Business & Society, 48, 206-224. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI

Lankoski, L. (2016). Alternative conceptions of sustainability in a business context. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 847-857. Google Scholar | Crossref

Lee, M.-D. P., Lounsbury, M. (2011). Domesticating radical rant and rage: An exploration of the consequences of environmental shareholder resolutions on corporate environmental performance. Business & Society, 50, 155-188. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI

Locke, J. (2013, May-June). Can global brands create just supply chains? Boston Review, pp. 12-17. Google Scholar

MacLean, T., Behnam, M. (2010). The dangers of decoupling: The relationship between compliance programs, legitimacy perceptions, and institutionalized misconduct. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1499-1520. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

Maggetti, M. (2012). Promoting corporate responsibility in private banking: Necessary and sufficient conditions for joining the Wolfsberg initiative against money laundering. Business & Society, 53, 787-819. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals

Mäkinen, J., Kourula, A. (2012). Pluralism in political corporate social responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22, 649-678. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

Maon, F., Lindgreen, A., Swaen, V. (2009). Designing and implementing corporate social responsibility: An integrative framework grounded in theory and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 71-89. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

Marano, V., Kostova, T. (2015). Unpacking the institutional complexity in adoption of CSR practices in multinational enterprises. Journal of Management Studies, 53, 28-54. doi: Google Scholar | Crossref

Margolis, J., Walsh, J. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268-305. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI

Matten, D., Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33, 404-424. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

Meyer, J. W., Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

Midttun, A., Gjolberg, M., Kourula, A., Sweet, S., Vallentin, S. (2015). Public policies for corporate social responsibility in four Nordic countries: Harmony of goals and conflict of means. Business and Society, 54, 464-500. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI

Misangyi, V. F., Greckhamer, T., Furnari, S., Fiss, P. C., Crilly, D., Aguilera, R. (2017). Embracing causal complexity: The emergence of a neo-configurational perspective. Journal of Management, 43, 255-282. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI

Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16, 145-179. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

Orton, J. D., Weick, K. E. (1990). Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 15, 203-223. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE. Google Scholar

Pope, S., Wæraas, A. (2016). CSR-washing is rare: A conceptual framework, literature review, and critique. Journal of Business Ethics, 137, 173-193. Google Scholar | Crossref

Porter, M. E., Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92. Google Scholar | Medline | ISI

Porter, M. E., Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value: How to reinvent capitalism—and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review, 89(1-2), 63-77. Google Scholar

Post, J., Preston, L., Sachs, S. (2002). Managing the extended enterprise: The new stakeholder view. California Management Review, 45, 6-28. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI

Prado-Lorenzo, J.-M., Gallego-Alvarez, I., Garcia-Sanchez, I. (2009). Stakeholder engagement and corporate social responsibility reporting: The ownership structure effect. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 14, 94-107. Google Scholar | Crossref

Ragin, C. (2009). Qualitative comparative analysis: Using fuzzy sets (fsQCA). In Rihoux, B., Ragin, C. (Eds.), Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis and related techniques (pp. 87-121). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Google Scholar | Crossref

Ragin, C., Fiss, P. (2008). Net effects analysis versus configurational analysis: An empirical demonstration. In Ragin, C. C. (Ed.), Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond (pp. 190-212). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | Crossref

Ragin, C., Sonnett, J. (2005). Between complexity and parsimony: Limited diversity, counterfactual cases, and comparative analysis. In Kropp, S., Minkenberg, M. (Eds.), Vergleichen in der Politikwissenschaft (pp. 1-19). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar | Crossref

Rihoux, B., Ragin, C. (2008). Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE. Google Scholar

Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson Chapin, S., Lambin, E. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461, 472-475. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI

Schneider, C., Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref

Slager, R. (2015). SRI Indices and responsible corporate behavior: A study of the FTSE4Good Index. Business & Society, 54, 386-405. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI

Soda, G., Furnari, S. (2012). Exploring the typology of the plausible: Fs/QCA counterfactual analysis and the plausible fit of unobserved organizational configurations. Strategic Organization, 10, 285-296. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI

Swanson, D. L. (1995). Addressing a theoretical problem by reorienting the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 20, 43-64. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

United Nations Environmental Program . (2005). Millennium ecosystem assessment Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press. Google Scholar

Vinodkumar, M., Bhasi, M. (2011). A study on the impact of management system certification on safety management. Safety Science, 49, 498-507. Google Scholar | Crossref

Wang, H., Tong, L., Takeuchi, R., George, G. (2016). Corporate Social Responsibility: An Overview and New Research Directions. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 534-544. Google Scholar | Crossref

Westermann-Behaylo, M., Berman, S. L., Van Buren, H. J. (2014). The influence of institutional logics on corporate responsibility towards employees. Business & Society, 53, 714-746. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI

Whiteman, G., Walker, B., Perego, P. (2013). Planetary boundaries: Ecological foundations for corporate sustainability. Journal of Management Studies, 50, 307-336. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

Wiklund, J. (2006). Commentary: Family firms and social responsibility: Preliminary evidence from the S&P 500. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 803-808. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI

Wong, E., Ormiston, M., Tetlock, P. (2011). The effects of top management team integrative complexity and decentralized decision making on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 1207-1228. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

Wood, D. (1991a). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 14, 691-718. Google Scholar | Crossref

Wood, D. (2010). Measuring corporate social performance: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 50-84. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

Wood, D. J. (1991b). Social issues in management: Theory and research in corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 17, 383-406. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI

Wood, D. J., Jones, R. E. (1995). Stakeholder mismatching: A theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3, 229-267. Google Scholar | Crossref

Worldwatch Institute . (2013). State of the world 2013: Is sustainability still possible? Google Scholar